Grr. Stab 'im wit a rusty spork!
Aug. 29th, 2002 02:13 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
One of the people on my friends list recently posted about raising money for top surgery. Common problem. Always a pain coming up with several thousand dollars, isn't it?
Someone responded (anon! no name!) to say that they are a non-op trans guy and maybe he'd be better off not getting surgery at all?
Fine, nothing wrong with that. But then this commenter went on with what a mess chest surgery results in, allusions to horror stories, "and it leaves a big dent in your side," yada yada...Jesus H. Christ! What the fuck is this guy's problem?!?
Now, I don't consider comments like this mine to respond to. It's not my journal, not my chest, not my life. But, boy, had that comment been in MY journal...!
I checked back to see the response, and I must say I never would have had the patience to answer that comment so calmly and politely. In fact, I'm sure I would have done my level best to rip that commenter into a thousand pieces.
My question is....how can people be so fucking thoughtless?
There are things I think it is "safe" to post your opinion on frankly. Nobody goes and commits suicide or something because another person doesn't agree with, say, their political viewpoint. But it is not right, IMHO, to go telling horror stories about SRS to trans people. ESPECIALLY if you don't know that person.
Being trans is fucking hard enough. There are people who are in very fragile emotional states about transition, and they are online. Most importantly, they are there for support. Carrying horror stories with no real reason to think they will be received well, and just to prove your point isn't helpful, it's SICK.
I'm not trying to say there is anything WRONG with being non-op...please don't misinterpret this. Were we all so lucky to make peace with our body. But there are other ways this guy could have presented his view.
If that comment had been in MY journal, say, a year ago (not that I had an lj a year ago, but we'll pretend) I probably would have considered suicide upon reading it.
Why don't people THINK?
Someone responded (anon! no name!) to say that they are a non-op trans guy and maybe he'd be better off not getting surgery at all?
Fine, nothing wrong with that. But then this commenter went on with what a mess chest surgery results in, allusions to horror stories, "and it leaves a big dent in your side," yada yada...Jesus H. Christ! What the fuck is this guy's problem?!?
Now, I don't consider comments like this mine to respond to. It's not my journal, not my chest, not my life. But, boy, had that comment been in MY journal...!
I checked back to see the response, and I must say I never would have had the patience to answer that comment so calmly and politely. In fact, I'm sure I would have done my level best to rip that commenter into a thousand pieces.
My question is....how can people be so fucking thoughtless?
There are things I think it is "safe" to post your opinion on frankly. Nobody goes and commits suicide or something because another person doesn't agree with, say, their political viewpoint. But it is not right, IMHO, to go telling horror stories about SRS to trans people. ESPECIALLY if you don't know that person.
Being trans is fucking hard enough. There are people who are in very fragile emotional states about transition, and they are online. Most importantly, they are there for support. Carrying horror stories with no real reason to think they will be received well, and just to prove your point isn't helpful, it's SICK.
I'm not trying to say there is anything WRONG with being non-op...please don't misinterpret this. Were we all so lucky to make peace with our body. But there are other ways this guy could have presented his view.
If that comment had been in MY journal, say, a year ago (not that I had an lj a year ago, but we'll pretend) I probably would have considered suicide upon reading it.
Why don't people THINK?
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-29 09:14 am (UTC)And I'm not one of the guys who has the luxury of "choice" on the matter (not that,actually, I think a lot of us do when it comes down to it) because of my familial history.
Way I see it anyway, thousands of women have a mastectomy every year and we don't hear horror stories about them. This procedure is just not -that- different. I've checked with family members so I know.
(shrug) Walking down the street every morning is a risk, but I sure don't want some anxiety ridden person dogging my every step detailing why i should just stay home because "things could happen".
Unfortunately, I think you're totally right about some people being in a more precarious mental state than others. Trans is a hard, hard card to draw in the scheme of things and you'd think other t-guys would be more sensative.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-29 11:54 am (UTC)it fell mostly into the "unneeded, unwanted, unsolicited, inaccurate, and poorly thought out advice" category, which just gets shunted into the /dev/null of the brain. mostly my thought was a fleeting, 'huh. must be hard to live as trans and opt against body mod.. but then again, he's identifying as a "gui," which (assuming it's not a typo) implies a level of gender fluidity/inbetweennness/whatever i am currently not claiming for myself and might imply a greater sense of peace with an unmodified body...' and i didn't notice the horror-storiness of the post (i think in part that the problems he cited: a dent, poor nipple placement (?? nature is symmetrical? has this guy ever *looked* at bioguys' chests?), are such nonissues to me), but more the patronizing tone.
i was mostly entertained by its anonymousness (huh--i should ban anonymous comments from my journal, except that once eli clare commented anonymously, and that was good) and by the curt, anonymous reply.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-29 04:42 pm (UTC)Anon comments are almost always a hoot. :D
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-29 05:28 pm (UTC)but i'm genderqueer by politics, though!
i must say, though, i have seen boi, but never gui. it's a nice way of claiming adult status while maintaining a level of genderqueerness.